4.7 Article

Effect of annealing treatment on structure and electrochemical performance of quenched MmNi4.2CO0.3Mn0.4Al0.3Mg0.03 hydrogen storage alloy

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 501, Issue 1, Pages 47-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.04.026

Keywords

Hydrogen storage alloy; Ni/MH battery; Annealing; Mg-added; Low-Co; Electrochemical performance

Funding

  1. General Research Institute for Nonferrous Metals-Xiamen Tungsten Corporation (GRINM-XTC) hydrogen storage alloy co-laboratory in PR China [2006090909]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MmNi(4.2)Co(0.3)Mn(0.4)Al(0.3)Mg(0.03) hydrogen storage alloy was prepared by single-roll rapid quenching followed by different annealing treatments for 8h at 1133K, 1173K, 1213K, and 1253K, respectively. Alloy structure, phase composition, pressure-composition-temperature (PCT) properties, and electrochemical performance of different annealed alloys have been investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), field-emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM), energy dispersion spectrometer (EDS), automatic Sieverts-type apparatus, and electrochemical experiments. Electrochemical experiments indicate that the annealing treatment at 1213 K extends cycle life from 193 cycles to 358 cycles, increases the maximum discharge capacity, and slightly decreases the activation behavior. Alloy structure analyses show that the improvement in cycle life is attributed to the formation of a single CaCu5-type structure or the relief of an Mg-containing AlMnNi2-type second phase. Pressure composition isotherms results illustrate that both the hydrogen absorption capability and the dehydriding equilibrium pressure go up with increased annealing temperature. For its good performance/cost ratio, the Mg-added low-Co alloy annealed at 1213 K would be a promising substitution for MmNi(4.05)Co(0.45)Mn(0.4)Al(0.3) alloy product. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available