4.8 Article

Cationic polystyrene nanospheres induce autophagic cell death through the induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 736-746

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c4nr05509h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Executive Yuan [DOH101-FDA-41301, DOH102-FDA-41702, MOHW103-FDA-41407]
  2. Ministry of Labor, Executive Yuan, Taiwan [1013080, 1023038, 1033059]
  3. US Public Health Service [U19 ES019528]
  4. NSF/EPA DBI [0830117, 1266377]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoparticles (NPs) have been used to produce a wide range of products that have applications in imaging and drug delivery in medicine. Due to their chemical stability, well-controlled sizes and surface charges, polystyrene (PS) NPs have been developed as biosensors and drug delivery carriers. However, the possible adverse biological effects and underlying mechanisms are still unclear. Recently, autophagy has been implicated in the regulation of cell death. In this study, we evaluated a library of PS NPs with different surface charges. We found that NH2-labeled polystyrene (NH2-PS) nanospheres were highly toxic with enhanced uptake in macrophage (RAW 264.7) and lung epithelial (BEAS-2B) cells. Furthermore, NH2-PS could induce autophagic cell death. NH2-PS increased autophagic flux due to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress caused by misfolded protein aggregation. The inhibition of ER stress decreased cytotoxicity and autophagy in the NH2-PS-treated cells. In addition, the Akt/mTOR and AMPK signaling pathways were involved in the regulation of NH2-PS-triggered autophagic cell death. These results suggest an important role of autophagy in cationic NP-induced cell death and provide mechanistic insights into the inhibition of the toxicity and safe material design.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available