4.8 Article

Self-assembly and continuous growth of hexagonal graphene flakes on liquid Cu

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 7, Issue 30, Pages 12820-12827

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr03352g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pioneer Research Center Program through National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2012-0009563]
  2. Global Frontier Program through National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2014M3A6B206301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graphene growth on liquid Cu has received great interest, owing to the self-assembly behavior of hexagonal graphene flakes with aligned orientation and to the possibility of forming a single grain of graphene through a commensurate growth of these graphene flakes. Here, we propose and demonstrate a two-step growth process which allows the formation of self-assembled, completely continuous graphene on liquid Cu. After the formation of full coverage on the liquid Cu, grain boundaries were revealed via selective hydrogen etching and the original grain boundaries were clearly resolved. This result indicates that, while the flakes self-assembled with the same orientation, there still remain structural defects, gaps and voids that were not resolved by optical microscopy or scanning electron microscopy. To overcome this limitation, the two-step growth process was employed, consisting of a sequential process of a normal single-layer graphene growth and self-assembly process with a low carbon flux, followed by the final stage of graphene growth at a high degree of supersaturation with a high carbon flux. Continuity of the flakes was verified via hydrogen etching and a NaCl-assisted oxidation process, as well as by measuring the electrical properties of the graphene grown by the two-step process. Two-step growth can provide a continuous graphene layer, but commensurate stitching should be further studied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available