4.8 Article

An electrochemical approach to graphene oxide coated sulfur for long cycle life

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 7, Issue 31, Pages 13249-13255

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5nr01951f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology through the Institute of Basic Science Program [IBS-R006-G1]
  2. Basic Science Research Program [2012M3A7B4049807]
  3. Converging Research Centre Program [2013K000162]
  4. Global Frontier R&D Program on Centre for Advanced Soft Electronics [20110031629]
  5. Global Research Lab (GRL) Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT Future, Korea [2011-0021972]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Owing to the possibilities of achieving high theoretical energy density and gravimetric capacity, sulfur has been considered as a promising cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries. However, sulfur shows rapid capacity fading due to the irreversible loss of soluble polysulfides and the decrease in active sites needed for conducting agents. Furthermore, the low electrical conductivity of sulfur hampers the full utilization of active materials. Here we report that graphene oxide coated sulfur composites (GO-S/CB) exhibit improved electrochemical stability as well as enhanced rate performance, evidenced by various electrochemical analyses. The cyclic voltammetry and the galvanostatic cycling analysis revealed that the GO plays key roles in homogenizing the nanocomposite structures of the electrodes, in improving the electrochemical contact, and in minimizing the loss of soluble polysulfide intermediates. An electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis also confirms the enhanced structural stability of the GO-S/CB composites after battery operation. As a result, the GO-S/CB exhibited excellent cycle stability and specific capacity as high as similar to 723.7 mA h g(-1) even after 100 cycles at 0.5 C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available