Journal
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages 997-1007Publisher
MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.12.1091
Keywords
Asthma; inflammatory phenotypes; gene expression; induced sputum; neutrophils; eosinophils
Categories
Funding
- John Hunter Hospital Charitable Trust, University of Newcastle
- Hunter Medical Research Institute
- NHMRC
- John Hunter Hospital Charitable Trust
- National Health and Medical Research Council
- NSA
- LLC
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Aerocrine
- Australian government NHMRC
- AstraZeneca
- Boehringer Ingelheim
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Airway inflammation is associated with asthma exacerbation risk, treatment response, and disease mechanisms. Objective: This study aimed to identify and validate a sputum gene expression signature that discriminates asthma inflammatory phenotypes. Methods: An asthma phenotype biomarker discovery study generated gene expression profiles from induced sputum of 47 asthmatic patients. A clinical validation study (n = 59 asthmatic patients) confirmed differential expression of key genes. A 6-gene signature was identified and evaluated for reproducibility (n = 30 asthmatic patients and n = 20 control subjects) and prediction of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) response (n = 71 asthmatic patients). Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated, and area under the curve (AUC) values were reported. Results: From 277 differentially expressed genes between asthma inflammatory phenotypes, we identified 23 genes that showed highly significant differential expression in both the discovery and validation populations. A signature of 6 genes, including Charcot-Leydon crystal protein (CLC); carboxypeptidase A3 (CPA3); deoxyribonuclease I-like 3 (DNASE1L3); IL-1 beta (IL1B); alkaline phosphatase, tissue-nonspecific isozyme (ALPL); and chemokine (C-X-C motif) receptor 2 (CXCR2), was reproducible and could significantly (P<.0001) discriminate eosinophilic asthma from other phenotypes, including patients with noneosinophilic asthma (AUC, 89.6%), paucigranulocytic asthma (AUC, 92.6%), or neutrophilic asthma (AUC, 91.4%) and healthy control subjects (AUC, 97.6%), as well as discriminating patients with neutrophilic asthma from those with paucigranulocytic asthma (AUC, 85.7%) and healthy control subjects (AUC, 90.8). The 6-gene signature predicted ICS response (>12% change in FEV1; AUC, 91.5%). ICS treatment reduced the expression of CLC, CPA3, and DNASE1L3 in patients with eosinophilic asthma. Conclusions: A sputum gene expression signature of 6 biomarkers reproducibly and significantly discriminates inflammatory phenotypes of asthma and predicts ICS treatment response. This signature has the potential to become a useful diagnostic tool to assist in the clinical diagnosis and management of asthma.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available