4.7 Article

Twin and family studies reveal strong environmental and weaker genetic cues explaining heritability of eosinophilic esophagitis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages 1084-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.07.021

Keywords

Eosinophilia; food allergy; medical genetics; twins; immune system diseases; heritability; gene-environment interaction; drug hypersensitivity; gastrointestinal diseases; skin diseases

Funding

  1. Cincinnati Children's Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology
  2. University of Cincinnati Research Council
  3. Campaign Urging Research for Eosinophilic Diseases (CURED)
  4. Food Allergy Research and Education (FARE)
  5. Buckeye Foundation
  6. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [T32-ES10957]
  7. NIEHS [P30-ES006096]
  8. CTSA
  9. NCATS
  10. NCRR/NIH [UL1-RR026314-01]
  11. UAB Section on Statistical Genetics [1R25GM093044-01]
  12. [NIH-1K24DK100303]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic antigen-driven allergic inflammatory disease, likely involving the interplay of genetic and environmental factors, yet their respective contributions to heritability are unknown. Objective: To quantify the risk associated with genes and environment on familial clustering of EoE. Methods: Family history was obtained from a hospital-based cohort of 914 EoE probands (n = 2192 first-degree Nuclear-Family relatives) and an international registry of monozygotic and dizygotic twins/triplets (n = 63 EoE Twins probands). Frequencies, recurrence risk ratios (RRRs), heritability, and twin concordance were estimated. Environmental exposures were preliminarily examined. Results: Analysis of the Nuclear-Family-based cohort revealed that the rate of EoE, in first-degree relatives of a proband, was 1.8% (unadjusted) and 2.3% (sex-adjusted). RRRs ranged from 10 to 64, depending on the family relationship, and were higher in brothers (64.0; P = .04), fathers (42.9; P = .004), and males (50.7; P < .001) than in sisters, mothers, and females, respectively. The risk of EoE for other siblings was 2.4%. In the Nuclear-Family cohort, combined gene and common environment heritability was 72.0% 6 2.7% (P < .001). In the Twins cohort, genetic heritability was 14.5% +/- 4.0% (P < .001), and common family environment contributed 81.0% +/- 4% (P < .001) to phenotypic variance. Probandwise concordance in monozygotic co-twins was 57.9% +/- 9.5% compared with 36.4% +/- 9.3% in dizygotic co-twins (P = .11). Greater birth weight difference between twins (P = .01), breast-feeding (P = .15), and fall birth season (P = .02) were associated with twin discordance in disease status. Conclusions: EoE RRRs are increased 10- to 64-fold compared with the general population. EoE in relatives is 1.8% to 2.4%, depending on relationship and sex. Nuclear-Family heritability appeared to be high (72.0%). However, the Twins cohort analysis revealed a powerful role for common environment (81.0%) compared with additive genetic heritability (14.5%).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available