4.7 Article

Does diversity of environmental microbial exposure matter for the occurrence of allergy and asthma?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 44-50

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.01.067

Keywords

Environmental exposure; farming exposure; microbial exposure; allergy; asthma; microbiome; protective effects

Funding

  1. European Commission
  2. InfectoPharm
  3. Airsonett AB

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review describes the recent literature on microbial exposures and protective effects for asthma and atopy. Certain microorganism-associated molecular patterns have been identified as agents that might influence the development of the immune system, which in turn leads to protective effects for asthma and atopy. Endotoxins from gram-negative bacteria were the first agents associated with a reduced risk for asthma and atopy. In later studies, beta(1 -> 3)glucans, extracellular polysaccharides, and muramic acid from, respectively, molds and gram-positive bacteria were associated with a reduced risk of allergy and asthma separately in rural and urban populations. These results already suggested that not just one but several independent microbial signals from gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, as well as molds, might play a role in explaining the protective effects. Recently, the diversity of microbial exposure has been associated with such a reduced risk in farmers' children. Surprisingly, the diversity of both fungal and bacterial exposure seemed to have protective effects. These results open new areas of research and create complex challenges. Methodological issues, such as environmental exposure characterization and assessment and elucidation of potential underlying mechanisms, are discussed because these aspects have a major influence on how microbial diversity can be studied in future studies in relation to protective effects for asthma and atopy. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;130:44-50.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available