4.7 Article

Mepolizumab, a humanized anti-IL-5 mAb, as a treatment option for severe nasal polyposis

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 128, Issue 5, Pages 989-U428

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.07.056

Keywords

Anti-IL-5; mepolizumab; eosinophils; chronic rhinosinusitis; nasal polyposis

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline [CRT110178]
  2. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  3. Interuniversity Attraction Poles Programme
  4. European Community under the PASCAL2 Network of Excellence [IST-2007-216886]
  5. GlaxoSmithKline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Approximately 85% of nasal polyps (NPs) in white subjects are characterized by prominent eosinophilia. IL-5 is the key driver of eosinophilic differentiation and survival. Objective: We sought to investigate the therapeutic potential of inhibiting IL-5 with a humanized mAb as treatment for severe nasal polyposis. Methods: Thirty patients with severe nasal polyposis (grade 3 or 4 or recurrent after surgery) refractory to corticosteroid therapy were randomized in a double-blindfashion to receive either 2 single intravenous injections (28 days apart) of 750 mg of mepolizumab (n = 20) or placebo (n = 10). Change from baseline in NP score was assessed monthly until 1 month after the last dose (week 8). Computed tomographic scans were also performed at week 8. Results: Twelve of 20 patients receiving mepolizumab had a significantly improved NP score and computed tomographic scan score compared with 1 of 10 patients receiving placebo at week 8 versus baseline. Conclusion: Mepolizumab achieved a statistically significant reduction in NP size for at least 1 month after dosing in 12 of 20 patients. IL-5 inhibition is a potential novel therapeutic approach in patients with severe eosinophilic nasal polyposis. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128:989-95.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available