4.7 Article

Vaccination of patients with mild and severe asthma with a 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus vaccine

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages 130-U215

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.11.014

Keywords

H1N1; asthma; influenza; vaccine; seroprotection; severe asthma

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) through National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [3 R01 HL069116-09S1]
  2. Rho, Inc
  3. NIAID [NO1-AI-25482]
  4. NIH [RO1 HL69170, HL081064]
  5. National Center for Research Resources [1UL1RR024989, UL1RR025008]
  6. Novartis
  7. AstraZeneca
  8. GlaxoSmithKline
  9. MedImmune
  10. Ception
  11. National Institutes of Health (NIH)/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  12. NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
  13. Elsevier
  14. NIH
  15. Genentech
  16. NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES [UL1TR000454, UL1TR000448] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  17. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [UL1RR024989, UL1RR025008] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  18. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL069170, R01HL069116, P01HL081064] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Asthma was the most common comorbidity of patients hospitalized with 2009 H1N1 influenza. Objective: We sought to assess the immunogenicity and safety of an unadjuvanted, inactivated 2009 H1N1 vaccine in patients with severe versus mild-to-moderate asthma. Methods: We conducted an open-label study involving 390 participants (age, 12-79 years) enrolled in October-November 2009. Severe asthma was defined as need for 880 mu g/d or more of inhaled fluticasone equivalent, systemic corticosteroids, or both. Within each severity group, participants were randomized to receive intramuscularly 15 or 30 mu g of 2009 H1N1 vaccine twice 21 days apart. Immunogenicity end points were seroprotection (hemagglutination inhibition assay titer >= 40) and seroconversion (4-fold or greater titer increase). Safety was assessed through local and systemic reactogenicity, asthma exacerbations, and pulmonary function. Results: In patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (n =217), the 2009 H1N1 vaccine provided equal seroprotection 21 days after the first immunization at the 15-mu g (90.6%; 95% CI, 83.5% to 95.4%) and 30-mu g (95.3%; 95% CI, 89.4% to 98.5%) doses. In patients with severe asthma (n = 173), seroprotection 21 days after the first immunization was 77.9% (95% CI, 67.7% to 86.1%) and 94.1% (95% CI, 86.8% to 98.1%) at the 15- and 30-mg doses, respectively (P = .004). The second vaccination did not provide further increases in seroprotection. Participants with severe asthma who are older than 60 years showed the lowest seroprotection (44.4% at day 21) with the 15-mg dose but had adequate seroprotection with 30 mg. The 2 dose groups did not differ in seroconversion rates. There were no safety concerns. Conclusion: Monovalent inactivated 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza vaccine was safe and provided overall seroprotection as a surrogate of efficacy. In patients older than 60 years with severe asthma, a 30-mg dose might be more appropriate. (J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;127:130-7.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available