4.7 Article

Epigenetic regulation of established human type 1 versus type 2 cytokine responses

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 1, Pages 57-63

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.09.004

Keywords

human; PBMCv; T(H)1/T(H)2; cytokine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Multiple biologic factors influence maintenance of immunologic responsiveness. Here, we studied whether epigenetics has a regulatory function in maintaining preestablished T(H)1-like and T(H)2-like immunity in human beings. Objective: We focused on delineating the role of endogenous histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity in regulating cytokine recall responses. Methods: Using RT-PCR and ELISA, the effect of increasing cellular acetylation on T(H)1/T(H)2 cytokine expression was systematically examined in 58 children by inhibiting HDAC activity with trichostatin A. Results: Phytohemagglutinin activation selectively stimulates antigen-experienced CD45RO(+) T cells, eliciting recall cytokine responses. Trichostatin A reduced HDAC activity by approximately 1/3. The resulting cellular hyperacetylation led to increased T(H)2-associated (IL-13, 139%; IL-5, 168%; P <.0001) and reduced T(H)1-associated recall responses (IFN-gamma, 76%; CXCL10, 47%; P <.0001). IL-2 and IL-10 production were reduced 25% to 55% (P <.0001). These alterations in T(H)2-associated and T(H)1-associated recall responses were associated with increased expression of Gata-3 and sphingosine kinase 1, a T(H)1-negative regulator, independent of T-bet expression. Overall, inhibition of endogenous HDAC activity shifted T(H)1:T(H)2 ratios by 3-fold to 8-fold (P <=.0001), skewing recall responses toward a more T(H)2-like phenotype, independent of the stimulus used. Conclusion: Endogenous HDAC activity plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance of pre-established T(H)1-like and T(H)2-like responses, inhibiting excessive T(H)2 immunity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available