4.7 Article

Delay in diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of childhood asthma

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 121, Issue 3, Pages 626-631

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.11.034

Keywords

DPT combination vaccine; childhood asthma; retrospective birth cohort; administrative health data

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Early childhood immunizations have been viewed as promoters of asthma development by stimulating a T(H)2-type immune response or decreasing microbial pressure, which shifts the balance between T(H)1 and T(H)2 immunity. Objective: Differing time schedules for childhood immunizations may explain the discrepant findings of an association with asthma reported in observational studies. This research was undertaken to determine whether timing of diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus (DPT) immunization has an effect on the development of childhood asthma by age 7 years. Methods: This was a retrospective longitudinal study of a cohort of children born in Manitoba in 1995. The complete immunization and health care records of cohort children from birth until age 7 years were available for analysis. The adjusted odds ratio for asthma at age 7 years according to timing of DPT immunization was computed from multivariable logistic regression. Results: Among 11, 531 children who received at least 4 doses of DPT, the risk of asthma was reduced to 1/2 in children whose first dose of DPT was delayed by more than 2 months. The likelihood of asthma in children with delays in all 3 doses was 0.39 (95% Cl, 0.18-0.86). Conclusion: We found a negative association between delay in administration of the first dose of whole-cell DPT immunization in childhood and the development of asthma; the association was greater with delays in all of the first 3 doses. The mechanism for this phenomenon requires further research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available