4.8 Article

Bench-top aqueous two-phase extraction of isolated individual single-walled carbon nanotubes

Journal

NANO RESEARCH
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages 1755-1769

Publisher

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-014-0680-z

Keywords

carbon nanotubes; aqueous two-phase (ATP) separation; aggregate removal; isolation; sorting

Funding

  1. LANL-LDRD program
  2. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders, Belgium (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  3. LANL
  4. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE [DE-AC36-08GO28308]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Isolation and purification of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) are prerequisites for their implementation in various applications. In this work, we present a fast (similar to 5 min), low-cost, and easily scalable bench-top approach to the extraction of high-quality isolated SWCNTs from bundles and impurities in an aqueous dispersion. The extraction procedure, based on aqueous two-phase (ATP) separation, is widely applicable to any SWCNT source (tested on samples up to 1.7 nm in diameter) and independent of defect density, purity, diameter, and length. The extracted dispersions demonstrate that the removal of large aggregates, small bundles, and impurities is comparable to that by density gradient ultracentrifugation, but without the need for high-end instrumentation. Raman and fluorescence-excitation spectroscopy, single-nanotube fluorescence imaging, atomic force and transmission electron microscopy, and thermogravimetric analysis all confirm the high purity of the isolated SWCNTs. By predispersing the SWCNTs without sonication (only gentle stirring), full-length, pristine SWCNTs can be isolated (tested up to 20 mu m). Hence, this simple ATP method will find immediate application in the generation of SWCNT materials for all levels of nanotube research and applications, from fundamental studies to high-performance devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available