4.8 Article

Photohole Induced Corrosion of Titanium Dioxide: Mechanism and Solutions

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 7051-7057

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03114

Keywords

TiO2; photoelectrochemical stability; photocorrosion; water oxidation

Funding

  1. UC MEXUS CONACYT Collaborative Research Grant
  2. U.S. NSF MRI grant [MRI-1126845]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been extensively investigated as photoanode for water oxidation, as it is believed to be one of the most stable photoanode materials. Yet, we surprisingly found that TiO2 photoanodes (rutile nanowire, anatase nanotube, and P25 nanopartide film) suffered from substantial photocurrent decay in neutral (Na2SO4) as well as basic (KOH) electrolyte solution. Photoelectrochemical measurements togehter with electron microscopy studies performed on rutile TiO2 nanowire photoanode show that the photocurrent decay is due to photohole induced corrosion, which competes with water oxidation reaction. Further studies reveal that photocurrent decay profile in neutral and basic solutions are fundamentally different. Notably, the structural reconstruction of nanowire surface occurs simultaneously with the corrosion of TiO2 in KOH solution resulting in the formation of an amorphous layer of titanium hydroxide, which slows down the photocorrosion. Based on this discovery, we demonstrate that the photoelectrochemical stability of TiO2 photoanode can be significantly improved by intentionally coating an amorphous layer of titanium hydroxide on the nanowire surface. The pretreated TiO2 photaonode exhibits an excellent photocurrent retention rate of 97% after testing in KOH solution for 72 h, while in comparison the untreated sample lost 10-20% of photocurrent in 12 h under the same measurement conditions. This work provides new insights in understanding of the photoelectrochemical stability of bare TiO2 photoanodes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available