4.8 Article

Highly Dense Cu Nanowires for Low-Overpotential CO2 Reduction

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 6829-6835

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03298

Keywords

Carbon dioxide; CO2 reduction; Cu nanowires; copper nanocatalysts; electrocatalysis; pH effect

Funding

  1. Johns Hopkins University
  2. Ralph E. Powe Jr. Faculty Enhancement Award (ORAU)
  3. National Science Foundation [CBET-1437219]
  4. Energy, Environmental, Sustainability and Health Institute (E2SHI) of Johns Hopkins University
  5. Division Of Chemistry
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1437396] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrochemical reduction of CO2, an artificial way of carbon recycling, represents one promising solution for energy and environmental sustainability. However, it is challenged by the lack of active and selective catalysts. Here, we report a two-step synthesis of highly dense Cu nanowires as advanced electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. CuO nanowires were first grown by oxidation of Cu mesh in air and then reduced by either annealing in the presence of hydrogen or applying a cathodic electrochemical potential to produce Cu nanowires. The two reduction methods generated Cu nano-wires with similar dimensions but distinct surface structures, which have provided an ideal platform for comparative studies of the effect of surface structure on the electrocatalytic properties. In particular, the Cu nanowires generated by electrochemical reduction were highly active and selective for CO2 reduction, requiring an overpotential of only 0.3 V to reach 1 mA/cm(2) electrode current density and achieving Faradaic efficiency toward CO as high as similar to 60%. Our work has advanced the understanding of the structure-property relationship of Cu-based nanocatalysts, which could be valuable for the further development of advanced electrocatalytic materials for CO2 reduction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available