4.8 Article

Nanostructured Carbon Allotropes with Weyl-like Loops and Points

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages 6974-6978

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02978

Keywords

Graphene network; Weyl semimetal; Weyl-like loops; Weyl-like points; flat surface band; surface Fermi arc

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11474243, 51376005, 11204262]
  2. UT Dallas research enhancement funds
  3. NSF [DMR-10-1006184]
  4. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory through the Office of Basic Science, US DOE [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. US DOE [DE-SC0002623]
  6. [SUTD-SRG-EPD2013062]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1006184] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Division Of Materials Research [1006184] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carbon allotropes are subject of intense investigations for their superb structural, electronic, and chemical properties, but not for topological band properties because of the lack of strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC). Here, we show that conjugated p-orbital interactions, common to most carbon allotropes, can in principle produce a new type of topological band structure, forming the so-called Weyl-like semimetal in the absence of SOC. Taking a structurally stable interpenetrated graphene network (IGN) as example, we show, by first-principles calculations and tight-binding modeling, that its Fermi surface is made of two symmetry-protected Weyl-like loops with linear dispersion along perpendicular directions. These loops are reduced to Weyl-like points upon breaking of the inversion symmetry. Because of the topological properties of these band-structure anomalies, remarkably, at a surface terminated by vacuum there emerges a flat band in the loop case and two Fermi arcs in the point case. These topological carbon materials may also find applications in the fields of catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available