4.8 Article

Modulating Antibacterial Immunity via Bacterial Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages 1403-1409

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nl504798g

Keywords

Nanomedicine; biomimetic nanoparticle; membrane coating; infectious disease; bacterial vaccine

Funding

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01DK095168]
  2. Defense Threat Reduction Agency Joint Science and Technology Office for Chemical and Biological Defense [HDTRA1-14-1-0064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthetic nanoparticles coated with cellular membranes have been increasingly explored to harness natural cell functions toward the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Herein, we report on a unique bacterial membrane-coated nanoparticle system as a new and exciting antibacterial vaccine. Using Escherichia coli as a model pathogen, we collect bacterial outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) and successfully coat them onto small gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) with a diameter of 30 nm. The resulting bacterial membrane-coated AuNPs (BM-AuNPs) show markedly enhanced stability in biological buffer solutions. When injected subcutaneously, the BM-AuNPs induce rapid activation and maturation of dendritic cells in the lymph nodes of the vaccinated mice. In addition, vaccination with BM-AuNPs generates antibody responses that are durable and of higher avidity than those elicited by OMVs only. The BM-AuNPs also induce an elevated production of interferon gamma (INF gamma) and interleukin-17 (IL-17), but not interleukin-4 (IL-4), indicating its capability of generating strong Th1 and Th17 biased cell responses against the source bacteria. These observed results demonstrate that using natural bacterial membranes to coat synthetic nanoparticles holds great promise for designing effective antibacterial vaccines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available