4.7 Article

Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles Impact Yield and Modify Nutritional Parameters in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 62, Issue 40, Pages 9669-9675

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf503526r

Keywords

amino acids; cerium oxide nanoparticles; engineered nanomaterials; fatty acids; wheat

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-0830117]
  2. Environmental Protection Agency [DBI-0830117]
  3. USDA [2011-38422-30835]
  4. NSF [CHE-0840525]
  5. Toxicology Unit of the BBRC (NIH NCRR) [2G12MD007592]
  6. Endowed Research Professorship
  7. Academy of Applied Science/U.S. Army REAP program at UTEP [W11NF-10-2-0076, 13-7]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The implicaitons of engineered nanomaterials on crop productivity and food quality are not yet well understood. the impact of cerium oxide nanoparticles (nCeO(2)) on growth and yield attributes and nutritional composition in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was examined Wheat was cultivated to grian production in soil amended with 0, 125, 250, and 500 mg of nCeO(2)/kg (control, nCeO(2)-L, nCeO(2)-M and nCeO(2)-H, respectively). At harvest, grians and tissues were analyzed for mineral, fatty acid, and amino acid content. Results showed that, relative to the control, nCeO(2)-H improved plant growth shoot biomass, and grian yield by 9.0%, 12.7% and 36.6%, respectively. Ce accumulation in rots increased at increased nCeO(2) concentration but did not change across treatments in leaves, hull, and grains, indicating a lack of Ce transport to the above-ground tissues. nCeO(2) modified S and Mn storage in grains. nCeO(2)-L modified the amino acid composition and increased linolenicracid by up to 6.17% but decreased linoleic acid by up to 1.63%, compared to the other treatments. The findings suggest the potential of nanoceria to modify crop physiology and food quality with unknown consequences for living organisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available