4.7 Article

Non-cytotoxic Antifungal Agents: Isolation and Structures of Gageopeptides A-D from a Bacillus Strain 109GGC020

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 62, Issue 24, Pages 5565-5572

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf502436r

Keywords

Bacillus subtilis; gageopeptides; antifungal agents; non-cytotoxicity

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology [PE99273]
  2. Korea Institute of Marine Science & Technology Promotion (KIMST) [E99240] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Antifungal resistance and toxicity problems of conventional fungicides highlighted the requirement of search for new safe antifungal agents. To comply with the requirement, we discovered four new non-cytotoxic lipopeptides, gageopeptides A D, 1-4, from a marine-derived bacterium Bacillus subtilis. The structures and stereochemistry of gageopeptides were determined by NMR data analysis and chemical means. Gageopeptides exhibited significant antifungal activities against pathogenic fungi Rhizoctonia solani, Botrytis cinerea, and Colletotrichum acutatum with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of 0.02-0.06 mu M. In addition, these lipopeptides showed significant motility inhibition and lytic activities against zoospores of the late blight pathogen Phytophthora capsici. These compounds also showed potent antimicrobial activity against Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria with MIC values of 0.04-0.08 mu M. However, gageopeptides A-D did not exhibit any cytotoxicity (GI(50) > 25 mu M) against cancer cell lines in sulforhodamine B (SRB), 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), and WST-1 ((4-[3-4-iodophenyl]-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio)-1,3-benzene disulfonate)) assays, demonstrating that these compounds could be promising candidates for the development of non-cytotoxic antifungal agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available