4.7 Article

High-Throughput Quantitative Biochemical Characterization of Algal Biomass by NIR Spectroscopy; Multiple Linear Regression and Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 61, Issue 50, Pages 12307-12314

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf403086f

Keywords

microalgae; biomass; lipids; infrared spectroscopy; multivariate calibration; chemometrics

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC36-08-GO28308]
  2. National Renewable Energy jointly as part of the BioEnergy Technology Office (BETO) [9.6.1.8]
  3. Sustainable Algal Biofuels Consortium project
  4. DOE [DE-EE0003372]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the challenges associated with microalgal biomass characterization and the comparison of microalgal strains and conversion processes is the rapid determination of the composition of algae. We have developed and applied a high-throughput screening technology based on near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy for the rapid and accurate determination of algal biomass composition. We show that NIR spectroscopy can accurately predict the full composition using multivariate linear regression analysis of varying lipid, protein, and carbohydrate content of algal biomass samples from three strains. We also demonstrate a high quality of predictions of an independent validation set. A high-throughput 96-well configuration for spectroscopy gives equally good prediction relative to a ring-cup configuration, and thus, spectra can be obtained from as little as 10-20 mg of material. We found that lipids exhibit a dominant, distinct, and unique fingerprint in the NIR spectrum that allows for the use of single and multiple linear regression of respective wavelengths for the prediction of the biomass lipid content. This is not the case for carbohydrate and protein content, and thus, the use of multivariate statistical modeling approaches remains necessary.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available