4.7 Article

Novel Chemiluminescence immunoassay for the Determination of Zearalenone in Food Samples Using Gold Nanoparticles Labeled with Streptavidin-Horseradish Peroxidase

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 61, Issue 18, Pages 4250-4256

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf400731j

Keywords

zearalenone; chemiluminescence; immunoassay; biotin-streptavidin; gold nanoparticles

Funding

  1. Chinese National Programs for High Technology Research and Development [2007AA10Z424]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel highly sensitive chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) was developed to detect zearalenone in food samples by using both biotinylated zearalenone conjugates and gold (Au) nanoparticles labeled with streptavidin horseradish peroxidase for signal amplification. Biotinylated zearalenone ovalbumin conjugates and Au nanoparticles labeled with streptavidin horseradish peroxidase were synthesized separately. The concentrations of immunoreagents and the reaction times of these immunoreagents were optimized to improve the performances of analytical methods. For the CLIA based on biotinylated zearalenone conjugates and Au nanoparticles labeled with streptavidin horseradish peroxidase, the limit of detection was 0.008 ng/mL and the IC50 was 0.11 ng/mL. The linear working range was 0.02-0.51 ng/mL. The cross-reactivities with the zearalenone analogues (alpha-zearalanol, zearalanone, alpha-zearalenol, beta-zearalanol, and beta-zearalenol) were 32, 17, 12, 0.3, and 0.1%, respectively. The recovery rates in spiked food samples were 97-117%, and the intraday and interday relative standard deviations were both <10%. Parallel analysis of natural food samples showed a good correlation between this novel CLIA and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. This method provides a rapid, accurate, and highly sensitive method to determine levels of zearalenone in food samples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available