4.7 Article

Chemical and Biological Assessment of Angelicae Sinensis Radix after Processing with Wine: An Orthogonal Array Design To Reveal the Optimized Conditions

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 59, Issue 11, Pages 6091-6098

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf200728e

Keywords

Angelicae sinensis (Oliv.) Diels; traditional Chinese medicine; orthogonal array design; quality control; processing with wine

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [6419/06M, N_HKUST629/07, 662608, 661110]
  2. Croucher Foundation [CAS-CF07/08.SC03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The roots of Angelica sinensis [Angelica Sinensis Radix (ASR)] have been used as a common health food supplement for women's care for thousands of years in China. According to Asian tradition, ASR could be processed with the treatment of wine, which subsequently promoted the biological functions of ASR. By chemical and biological assessments, an orthogonal array design was employed here to determine the roles of three variable parameters in the processing of ASR, including oven temperature, baking time, and flipping frequency. The results suggested that oven temperature and baking time were two significant factors, while flipping frequency was a subordinate factor. The optimized condition of processing with wine therefore was considered to be heating in an oven at 80 degrees C for 90 min with flipping twice per hour. Under the optimized processing conditions, the solubilities of ferulic acid and Z-ligustilide from ASR were markedly increased and decreased, respectively. In parallel, the biological functions of processed ASR were enhanced in both anti-platelet aggregation and estrogenic activation; these increased functions could be a result of the altered levels of ferulic acid and Z-ligustilide in wine-processed ASR. Thus, the chemical and biological assessment of the processed ASR was in full accordance with the Chinese old tradition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available