4.7 Article

α-Glucosidase and Aldose Reductase Inhibitory Activities from the Fruiting Body of Phellinus merrillii

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 59, Issue 10, Pages 5702-5706

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf2003943

Keywords

Chinese herb; Phellinus merrillii; alpha-glucosidase; aldose reductase; hispidin derivatives; flavonoid

Funding

  1. National Science Council [NSC 97-2313-B-039-001-MY3]
  2. China Medical University (CMU) [CMU95-PH-11, CMU96-113, CMU97-232]
  3. Taiwan Department of Heath Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence [DOH100-TD-B-111-004]
  4. Cancer Research Center of Excellence [DOH100-TD-C-111-005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The inhibitory activity from the isolated component of the fruiting body Phellinus merrillii (PM) was evaluated against alpha-glucosidase and lens aldose reductase from Sprague Dawley male rats and compared to the quercetin as an aldose reductase inhibitor and, acarbose as an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor. The ethanol extracts of PM (EPM) showed the strong alpha-glucosidase and aldose reductase activities. alpha-Glucosidase and aldose reductase inhibitors were identified as hispidin (A), hispolon (B), and inotilone (C), which were isolated from EtOAc-soluble fractions of EPM. The above structures were elucidated by their spectra and comparison with the literatures. Among them, hispidin, hispolon, and inotilone exhibited potent against alpha-glucosidase inhibitor activity with IC50 values of 297.06 +/- 2.06, 12.38 +/- 0.13, and 18.62 +/- 0.23 mu g/ml,, respectively, and aldose reductase inhibitor activity with IC50 values of 48.26 +/- 2.48, 9.47 +/- 0.52, and 15.37 +/- 0.32 mu g/mL, respectively. These findings demonstrated that PM may be a good source for lead compounds as alternatives for antidiabetic agents currently used. The importance of finding effective antidiabetic therapeutics led us to further investigate natural compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available