4.7 Article

Proteome Changes during Meat Aging in Tough and Tender Beef Suggest the Importance of Apoptosis and Protein Solubility for Beef Aging and Tenderization

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 57, Issue 22, Pages 10755-10764

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf901949r

Keywords

Proteome analysis; beef muscle; tenderness; hierarchical clustering analysis; protein solubility; proteolysis; HSP27; glycolytic enzymes; mitochondrial membrane

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Within a population of Charolais young bulls, two extreme groups of longissimus thoracis muscle samples, classified according to Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) of 55 degrees C grilled meat, were analyzed by 2D-electrophoresis. Muscle analyses were performed on 4 bulls of the tender group (WBSF = 27.7 +/- 4.8 N) and 4 bulls of the tough group (WBSF = 41.2 +/- 6.1 N), at 3 post-mortem times: DO, samples taken within 10 min post-mortem; D5 and D21, samples kept at 4 degrees C under vacuum during 5 and 21 days. Proteins of muscle samples were separated in two fractions based on protein solubility in Tris buffer: soluble and Insoluble. Proteins of both fractions were separated by 2D-electrophoresis. Evolution of spots during the 3 post-mortem times was analyzed by hierarchical classification (HCA). Three clusters of proteins presenting similar evolution profiles provided accurate classification of post-mortem times and showed the translocation of some chaperone proteins and glycolytic enzymes from the soluble fraction to the insoluble fraction between DO and D5. Cellular structure dismantlement and proteolysis was observed at D21. Effect of group (tender vs tough) on spot intensities was tested by ANOVA. At DO, higher quantity of proteins of the inner and outer membrane of mitochondria was found in the tender group suggesting a more extensive degradation of mitochondria that may be related to the apoptotic process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available