4.7 Article

Cloning, Expression, and Characterization of an Enzyme Possessing both Glutaredoxin and Dehydroascorbate Reductase Activity from Taiwanofungus camphorata

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 57, Issue 21, Pages 10357-10362

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf9021256

Keywords

Taiwanofungus camphorata; glutaredoxin; three-dimension homology structure (3D homology structure); expression; beta-hydroxyethyl disulfide [HED, (HOCH2CH2)(2)S-2]; dehydroascorbate (DHA)

Funding

  1. National Science Council of the Republic of China [NSC 97-2313-B-019-001-MY3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glutaredoxins (Grxs) play important roles in the reduction of disulfides via reduced glutathione as a reductant. A cDNA (503 bp, EU193660) encoding a putative Grx was cloned from Taiwanofugus camphorata (Tc). The deduced amino acid sequence is conserved among the reported dithiol Grxs. A 3D homology structure was created for this TcGrx. To characterize the TcGrx enzyme, the coding region was subcloned into an expression vector pET-20b(+) and transformed into Escherichia coli. Functional TcGrx was expressed and purified by Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid Sepharose. The purified enzyme showed bands of similar to 15 kDa on 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). The TcGrx encodes a protein possessing both Grx and dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) activity. The Michaelis constant (K-m) values for beta-hydroxyethyl disulfide (HED) and dehydroascorbate (DHA) were 0.57 and 1.85 mM, respectively. The half-life of deactivation of the protein at 100 degrees C was 8.5 min, and its thermal inactivation rate constant K-d was 6.52 x 10(-2) min(-1). The enzyme was active under a broad pH range from 6.0 to 10.0 and in the presence of imidazole up to 0.4 M. The enzyme was susceptible to SDS denaturation and protease degradation/inactivation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available