4.7 Article

Postnatal depression in Mexican American fathers: Demographic, cultural, and familial predictors

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 360-368

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.09.038

Keywords

Postpartum depression; Fathers; Mexican American

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [R01 MH083173-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Although maternal postpartum depression (PPD) is a well-documented phenomenon that has been the focus of a large body of literature, much less is known about the prevalence and predictors of depressive symptoms among fathers following the birth of a child. Particularly scarce is research with Mexican American men, an understudied population at high risk given limited socioeconomic resources and elevated rates of maternal PPD. Methods: The current study used descriptive and path analyses to examine the prevalence and predictors of PPD in 92 Mexican American Gathers (M age =31.3 years). Results: At both 15 and 21 postpartum week assessments, 9% of fathers met criteria for PPD. Path analyses suggested that unemployment status, fewer biological children, poor marital relationship quality, and lower orientation to Anglo culture predicted higher 15 week paternal PPD symptoms, which was associated with greater paternal depressive symptoms at 21 weeks. Predictive paths from symptoms of maternal to paternal PPD were not significant. Limitations: Lack of generalizability to other ethnic groups, sampling of primarily resident fathers, and the absence of historical assessments of depression are limitations of the current study. Conclusions: Findings support the importance of PPD screenings among Mexican American fathers and suggest certain demographic, familial, and cultural factors may render men particularly vulnerable for maladjustment during the early infancy period. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available