4.7 Article

Abnormal amplitude low-frequency oscillations in medication-naive, first-episode patients with major depressive disorder: A resting-state fMRI study

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 146, Issue 3, Pages 401-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.10.001

Keywords

Major depressive disorder; Resting-state fMRI; Fractional amplitude of low frequency fluctuation; Medication-naive; First-episode

Funding

  1. 973 project [2012CB517901]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [61125304, 61035006, 81171406, 81260210]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent resting-state fMRI studies on major depressive disorder (MDD) have found altered temporal correlation between low-frequency oscillations (LFOs). However, changes on the amplitudes of these LFOs remain largely unknown. Methods: Twenty-two medication-naive, first-episode patients with MDD and 19 age-, sex-, education-matched healthy controls were recruited. Resting-state fMRI was obtained by using an echo-planar imaging sequence and the fractional amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations (fALFF) was calculated to investigate the amplitude of LFOs in the resting state. Results: Compared with control subjects, patients with MDD showed significantly decreased fALFF in right cerebellum posterior lobe, left parahippocampal gyms and right middle frontal gyrus and increased fALFF in left superior occipital gyrus/cuneus (p < 0.05, corrected for multiple comparisons). Further receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) analyses suggested that the alterations of fALFF in these regions might be used as markers to classify patients with MDD from healthy controls. Conclusions: These findings indicated LFOs abnormalities in MDD and the fALFF analysis might be a potential approach in further exploration of this disorder. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available