4.7 Review

New treatment guidelines for acute bipolar mania: A critical review

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 140, Issue 2, Pages 125-141

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.015

Keywords

Bipolar mania; Treatment; Guidelines

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  3. CIBERSAM
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya [2009 SGR 1022]
  5. Instituto Carlos III, Madrid, Spain [CP08/00140]
  6. FIS [PI09/1044]
  7. Spanish Ministry of Education through a FPU [AP2008-01923]
  8. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Rio Ortega contract [CM08/00028]
  9. Astra-Zeneca
  10. Bristol-Myers-Squibb
  11. Eli Lilly
  12. Janssen
  13. Novartis
  14. Pfizer
  15. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Sanofi-aventis
  16. Spanish Ministry of Health
  17. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (CIBERSAM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder have been published and updated in the last few years. They are aimed at providing a synthesis of the best available scientific knowledge, and their application to every-day work should be helpful to clinicians. The aim of this report is to critically review recent guidelines focusing on the treatment of manic/hypomanic and mixed episodes. Guidelines are quite heterogeneous in methodology and conclusions, but they all agree that the treatment of manic/hypomanic and mixed episodes should generally be initiated with a medication such as lithium (Li), valproate (VPA) or atypical antipsychotics (AAP), including aripiprazole, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone as monotherapy. All guidelines agree on stopping ongoing antidepressant medication during mania. Combination therapy including Li or VPA with an AAP is suggested usually as second-line choice, sometimes as first-choice treatment for severe mania. Carbamazepine is mostly suggested as second line and not recommended in combination. Other antiepileptic drugs are not recommended for the treatment of mania, although lamotrigine may be maintained if it was prescribed previously for the prevention of depressive episodes. Main sources of discrepancies among guidelines include benefit risk ratio issues ( how much priority is given to efficacy over safety and tolerability), starting with combination versus monotherapy, and how to deal with treatments which are more experience-based than evidence-based (i.e.: electroconvulsive therapy). (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available