4.7 Review

CBT for pharmacotherapy non-remitters-a systematic review of a next-step strategy

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 129, Issue 1-3, Pages 219-228

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.08.025

Keywords

Anxiety disorder; Cognitive-behavioral therapy; Resistant; Next-step; Systematic review

Funding

  1. CNPq (Nacional Research Council) Federal Government of Brazil
  2. FAPERJ [E-6/110.324/2007]
  3. Confederacao Nacional do Comercio
  4. CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Non-remission rates to pharmacotherapy for anxiety disorders are related to higher relapse rates, decreased quality of life and greater functional impairment. Here we sought to investigate the efficacy of cognitive-behavior therapy (CBT) as a next-step strategy in the treatment of patients with anxiety disorders who did not remit after a pharmacological intervention. Method: We carried out a systematic review in the ISI, Pubmed and PsycINFO/PsychLit databases. Studies that did not use CBT and that did not focus on resistance to drug therapy were excluded. We considered resistant patients who failed to respond (did not fully remit) to an adequate trial of pharmacotherapy and still exhibited residual symptoms of anxiety disorder. Results: We identified 603 references in our survey, of which 17 were included: eight were on OCD, five on panic disorder, and four on PTSD. No studies were found on social anxiety disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. We observed a lack of standardization of terminology and of definitions of resistance, which makes comparison of results difficult. Finally, all of the identified studies showed benefits from the addition of CBT as a next-step strategy. Limitations: A limited number of randomized controlled studies were found. Conclusions: CBT seems to be a promising next-step strategy for patients with anxiety disorders who did not remit with drug-based therapies. However, further clinical trials with strong methodological designs are needed to definitely establish its efficacy in this population. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available