4.7 Article

Asenapine for long-term treatment of bipolar disorder: A double-blind 40-week extension study

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages 358-365

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.04.005

Keywords

Asenapine; Bipolar disorder; Mania; Olanzapine; Tolerability

Funding

  1. Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA
  2. Pfizer Inc.
  3. Wyeth
  4. GlaxoSmithKline
  5. Merck
  6. Servier
  7. AstraZeneca
  8. Schering-Plough Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Asenapine is approved in the United States for acute treatment of manic or mixed episodes of bipolar I disorder with or without psychotic features. We report the results of long-term treatment with asenapine in patients with bipolar I disorder. Methods: Patients completing either of two 3-week efficacy trials and a subsequent 9-week double-blind extension were eligible for this 40-week double-blind extension. Patients in the 3-week trials were randomized to flexible-dose asenapine (5 or 10 mg BID), placebo, or olanzapine (5-20 mg QD; included for assay sensitivity only). Patients entering the extension phase maintained their preestablished treatment; those originally randomized to placebo received flexible-dose asenapine (placebo/asenapine). Safety and tolerability endpoints included adverse events (AEs), extrapyramidal symptoms, laboratory values, and anthropometric measures. Efficacy, a secondary assessment, was measured as change in Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score from 3-week trial baseline to week 52 with asenapine or olanzapine; the placebo/asenapine group was assessed for safety only. Results: Incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was 71.9%, 86.1%, and 79.4% with placebo/asenapine, asenapine, and olanzapine, respectively. The most frequent treatment-emergent AEs were headache and somnolence with placebo/asenapine; insomnia, sedation, and depression with asenapine; and weight gain, somnolence, and sedation with olanzapine. Among observed cases, mean +/- SD changes in YMRS total score at week 52 were -28.6 +/- 8.1 and -28.2 +/- 6.8 for asenapine and olanzapine, respectively. Limitations: The study did not have a long-term placebo group. Conclusions: In this 52-week extension in patients with bipolar mania, asenapine was well tolerated and long-term maintenance of efficacy was supported. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available