Journal
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 126, Issue 3, Pages 441-446Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.04.019
Keywords
Anxiety disorder; Depressive disorder; Alcohol abuse; Alcohol dependence; AUDIT; Screening
Categories
Funding
- Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development [10-000-1002, 31160004]
- VU University Medical Center
- GGZ inGeest
- Arkin
- Leiden University Medical Center
- GGZ Rivierduinen
- University Medical Center Groningen
- Lentis
- GGZ Friesland
- GGZ Drenthe
- Scientific Institute for Quality of Health Care (IQ Healthcare)
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL)
- Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction (Trimbos)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: Alcohol use disorders are highly prevalent but often remain unrecognized among depressed and/or anxious persons. This study examines the performance of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) in detecting alcohol abuse and dependence in this high-risk group and compares it to that in healthy controls. Methods: Data from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) were used, including 1756 persons with a past-year depressive and/or anxiety disorder and 648 persons without a lifetime depressive and anxiety disorder. The performance of the AUDIT was compared against the gold standard of a CIDI-based diagnosis of past-year alcohol abuse or dependence by means of sensitivity, specificity and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Results: The AUDIT accurately detected alcohol dependence in depressed and/or anxious men (AUC = 0.89) and women (AUC = = 0.88), with detected cut-off points of >= 9 and >= 6, respectively, comparable to that in healthy controls (men: AUC = 0.89; women: AUC = 0.94). However, the overall accuracy in detecting alcohol abuse was limited in depressed/anxious men (AUC = 0.74) and women (AUC = 0.78) and no adequate cut-off points with both acceptable sensitivity and specificity could be identified. Limitations: Persons with a primary diagnosis of an addiction disorder were excluded and therefore the sample may not be fully representative of the most severely addicted patients. Conclusions: These findings confirm the accuracy of the AUDIT in detecting alcohol dependence, but not alcohol abuse, in depressed and/or anxious persons. Screening for alcohol dependence in this high-risk group could improve identification of persons suffering from this impairing comorbid condition. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available