4.7 Review

Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) Clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. Ill. Pharmacotherapy

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages S26-S43

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.041

Keywords

Depressive disorders; MDD; Antidepressant; Pharmacotherapy; Canadian; Guidelines; Systematic review; Treatment; Adverse effects; Treatment-resistant depression

Funding

  1. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments
  2. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc.
  3. AstraZeneca
  4. BrainCells Inc.
  5. Biovail
  6. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  7. Canadian Psychiatric Research Foundation
  8. Eli Lilly
  9. Janssen
  10. Litebook Company Ltd.
  11. Lundbeck
  12. Lundbeck Institute
  13. Mathematics of Information Technology and Advanced Computing Systems
  14. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
  15. Servier
  16. Takeda
  17. UBC Institute of Mental Health/Coast Capital Savings
  18. Wyeth
  19. Boehringer-Ingelhem
  20. GlaxoSmithKline
  21. Janssen-Ortho
  22. Merck Frosst
  23. CR Younger Foundation
  24. Ontario Mental Health Foundation
  25. Organon
  26. Pfizer
  27. France Foundation
  28. I3CME
  29. Physicians' Postgraduate Press
  30. Schering-Plough
  31. Shire
  32. Solvay/Wyeth
  33. Alberta Medical Services Incorporated
  34. Calgary Health Region
  35. Hotchkiss Brain Institute
  36. University of Calgary
  37. Apotex
  38. Novartis
  39. Cipher Pharmaceuticals
  40. Norlein Foundation
  41. Roche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In 2001, the Canadian Psychiatric Association and the Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) partnered to produce evidence-based clinical guidelines for the treatment of depressive disorders. A revision of these guidelines was undertaken by CANMAT in 2008-2009 to reflect advances in the field. Methods: The CANMAT guidelines are based on a question-answer format to enhance accessibility to clinicians. An evidence-based format was used with updated systematic reviews of the literature and recommendations were graded according to Level of Evidence using pre-defined criteria. Lines of Treatment were identified based on criteria that included Levels of Evidence and expert clinical support. This section on Pharmacotherapy is one of 5 guideline articles. Results: Despite emerging data on efficacy and tolerability differences amongst newer antidepressants, variability in patient response precludes identification of specific first choice medications for all patients. All second-generation antidepressants have Level 1 evidence to support efficacy and tolerability and most are considered first-line treatments for MDD. First-generation tricyclic and monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressants are not the focus of these guidelines but generally are considered second- or third-line treatments. For inadequate or incomplete response, there is Level 1 evidence for switching strategies and for add- on strategies including lithium and atypical antipsychotics. Limitations: Most of the evidence is based on trials for registration and may not reflect real-world effectiveness. Conclusions: Second-generation antidepressants are safe, effective and well tolerated treatments for MDD in adults. Evidence-based switching and add-on strategies can be used to optimize response in MDD that is inadequately responsive to monotherapy. (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available