4.7 Article

Neurocognitive and symptomatic predictors of functional outcome in bipolar disorders: A prospective 1 year follow-up study

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 116, Issue 1-2, Pages 37-42

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.023

Keywords

Disability; Verbal memory; Attention; Executive function; Subsyndromal depression

Funding

  1. National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim of this study was to estimate the predictive value of cognitive impairments and time spent ill in long-term functional outcome of patients with bipolar disorder (BD). Methods: Thirty five patients with euthymic BD completed a neurocognitive battery to assess verbal memory, attention, and executive functions at study entry. The course of illness was documented prospectively for a period longer than 12 months using a modified life charting technique based on the NIMH life-charting method. Psychosocial functioning was assessed with the General Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the Functioning Assessment Short Test (FAST)at the end of follow-up period when patients were euthymic. Results: Impairments in verbal memory and in attention, as well as subsyndromal depressive symptomatology were independent predictors of GAF score at the end of the study explaining 43% of variance. Similarly, impairments in attention and executive functioning were independent predictors of FAST score explaining 28% of variance. Limitations: We did not control factors that could affect functional outcome such as psychosocial interventions, familiar support and housing and financial resources. Conclusions: Both cognitive impairments and time spent with subsyndromal depressive symptomatology may be illness features associated with poorer long-term functional outcome. Developing strategies to treat these illness features might contribute to enhance long-term functional outcome among patients with BD. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available