4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Impulsive youth suicide attempters are not necessarily all that impulsive

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 107, Issue 1-3, Pages 107-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.08.010

Keywords

adolescents; suicidal behavior; impulsivity

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [1 F31 MH077386-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The relationship between impulsivity and suicide has been conceptualized in the literature as a direct one. In contrast, Joiner's [Joiner, T.E., 2005. Why people die by suicide. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.] theory posits that this relationship is indirect in that impulsive individuals are more likely to engage in suicidal behavior because impulsivity makes one more likely to be exposed to painful and provocative stimuli. Method: Adolescents were selected from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) sample between the years of 1993-2003 who had planned for a suicide attempt but did not actually attempt (n = 5685), who did not plan but did attempt (impulsive attempters; n = 1172), and who both planned and attempted (n =4807). Items were selected from the YRBS to assess demographic variables, suicidal behaviors, and impulsive behaviors. Results: Participants who had planned suicide without attempting were significantly less impulsive than those who had attempted without planning and than those who had both planned and attempted. Crucially, participants who had made a suicide attempt without prior planning were less impulsive than those who had planned and attempted. Limitations: We were unable to conduct a multi-method assessment (i.e., measures were self-report); the measure of impulsivity consisted of items pulled from the YRBS rather than a previously validated impulsivity measure. Conclusions: The notion that the most impulsive individuals are more likely to plan for suicide attempts is an important one for many reasons both theoretical and clinical, including that it may refine risk assessment and attendant clinical decision-making. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available