4.6 Article

Control and improvement of jet stability by monitoring liquid meniscus in electrospray and electrohydrodynamic jet

Journal

JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 29-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2014.01.004

Keywords

Stabilization of spray and jetting; Control of voltage; Electrospray; Electrohydrodynamic jet; Meniscus visualization

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2011-0016461]
  3. Regenerative Energy Technology Research Program through Korea Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  4. Ministry of Knowledge and Commerce [20113020010060]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrospray and electrohydrodynamic (EHD) jet have been paid much attention to produce fine droplets or particles. However, although applying a constant voltage, meniscus fluctuation may occur because of the variation in electric field. There are various reasons for the change in electric field such as distance between a nozzle to a substrate, wetting condition, pressure drop, and liquid vaporization. The fluctuation of the meniscus during jetting may cause unstable jetting and spray, which results in nonuniform patterning or coating. To tackle this problem, this paper introduces an advanced control of applied voltage that keeps the meniscus stable. An image processing method called meniscus characterization is used to provide information about the meniscus shape to a controller as a feedback signal. In addition, this meniscus information is also used to evaluate an optimal voltage that is applied to the nozzle to improve the startup time in the spray and EHD ejection. The experiment results show that the shape of meniscus is stably maintained, the jetting and the electrospray also become stable and the jet startup time is reduced. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available