4.6 Review

An integrative review of the factors influencing new graduate nurse engagement in interprofessional collaboration

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
Volume 70, Issue 1, Pages 4-20

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jan.12195

Keywords

barriers; facilitators; integrative review; interprofessional collaboration; new graduate nurse

Categories

Funding

  1. Faculty of Nursing at the University of Windsor in Windsor, ON, Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo analyse critically the barriers and facilitators to new graduate nurse engagement in interprofessional collaboration. BackgroundThe acculturation of new graduate nurses must be considered in strategies that address the global nursing shortage. Interprofessional collaboration may support the transition and retention of new graduate nurses. DesignWhittemore and Knafl's revised framework for integrative reviews guided the analysis. Data sourcesA comprehensive multi-step search (published 2000-2012) of the North American interprofessional collaboration and new graduate literature indexed in the CINAHL, Proquest, Pubmed, PsychINFO and Cochrane databases was performed. A sample of 26 research and non-research reports met the inclusion criteria. Review methodsAll 26 articles were included in the review. A systematic and iterative approach was used to extract and reduce the data to draw conclusions. ResultsThe analysis revealed several barriers and facilitators to new graduate engagement in interprofessional collaboration. These factors exist at the individual, team and organizational levels and are largely consistent with conceptual and empirical analyses of interprofessional collaboration conducted in other populations. However, knowledge and critical thinking emerged as factors not identified in previous analyses. ConclusionDespite a weak-to-moderate literature sample, this review suggests implications for team and organizational development, education and research that may support new graduate nurse engagement in IPC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available