4.4 Article

Effect of citric acid, PVOH, and starch ratio on the properties of cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol)/starch adhesives

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADHESION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 15, Pages 1727-1738

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2012.753394

Keywords

PVOH; tapioca starch; cross-linked adhesives; citric acid; shear strength

Funding

  1. Graduate School of Prince of Songkla University
  2. University-Industry Research Collaboration Program
  3. U-IRC of the National Science and Technology Development Agency
  4. NSTDA
  5. Thai government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The properties of tapioca starch adhesives were improved by cross-linking and the cross-linked adhesive compared with pure tapioca starch and poly(vinyl alcohol) adhesives. The effect of starch ratio, type of PVOH, and adding citric acid were important factors on the cross-linked adhesives. Wood adhesives made from cross-linked PVOH/starch were prepared by PVOH and tapioca starch, using hexamethoxymethyl melamine (HMMM) and citric acid (CA) as a cross-linking agent and catalyst, respectively. The effect of CA, PVOH/starch ratio, and type of PVOH such as medium (M PVOH) and high molecular weight (H PVOH) were investigated. The condition of the cross-linking reaction was 175 degrees C for 15min. The structural properties of cross-linked adhesive were investigated by FT-IR spectroscopy. The results were confirmed in terms of thermal properties with a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and the shear strength of the adhesive. The cross-linked adhesive resulted in the increase of T-g and showed good blend compatibility with all of the cross-linked adhesives. The adhesive strength significantly increased when using CA as a catalyst in the cross-linking reaction. The optimum contents of the cross-linked PVOH/starch adhesives were 1:1.8 for M PVOH and 1:0.5 for H PVOH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available