4.3 Article

Atmospheric Pressure Plasma Hydrophilic Modification of a Silicone Surface

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADHESION
Volume 88, Issue 4-6, Pages 321-336

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2012.659994

Keywords

Atmospheric pressure plasma; Hydrophobic recovery; Polymeric adhesion; Silicone

Funding

  1. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Foundation
  2. Chemistry and Materials Technological Institute
  3. Universidad Pontificia Comillas (ICAI) (Spain)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was the creation of a silicone hydrophilic surface prior to bonding. Modifications in wettability and adhesion properties of silicone were performed with an atmospheric plasma torch (APPT). Surface energy variations of the substrate, both pristine and APPT-treated, were evaluated through contact angle measurements, studying the hydrophobic recovery of the samples up to 24 hours of aging. Compositional and topographical changes induced by APPT and aging were studied by attenuated total multiple reflection mode infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), mechanical profilometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM), respectively. Adhesion pull-off tests were performed on silicone-aluminium stud joints using three commercial adhesives, which were Sikaflex (R)-252, polyurethane-based, Loctite (R)-330, urethane methacrylate ester-based acrylic, and Terostat (R)-922, modified silicone. Although experimental data of all the bonding specimens led to an undesired adhesive failure, it was found that APPT-treated samples gave higher adhesive strength than the pristine ones, which was explained by the higher surface energy, thus more wettable material, after APPT. This effect remained stable for just 1 h, when the substrate began its hydrophobic recovery, reaching the original surface energy values after 24 h of aging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available