4.1 Article

The effect of Bangerter filters on optotype acuity, Vernier acuity, and contrast sensitivity

Journal

JOURNAL OF AAPOS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages 555-559

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.04.012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY015799-02, EY011751, EY015799, U10 EY011751-07, U10 EY011751, R01 EY015799] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE Bangerter filters are designed to cause progressive degradation of distance optotype acuity to predicted levels (density label indicating expected decimal acuity) and are used to treat amblyopia and diplopia. Few authors have reported data regarding induced acuity deficits. We investigated the effect of Bangerter filters on distance and near optotype acuity, vernier acuity, and contrast sensitivity. METHODS Fifteen subjects with best-corrected optotype acuity of at least 20125 In each eve were blurred sequentially in one eye with 7 Bangerter filters (densities <0.1, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.8, and 1.0). At each filter level, distance and near optotype acuity (LogMAR), vernier acuity, and contrast sensitivity were assessed. Mean log acuities were compared using generalized estimating equation methods. RESULTS The 1.0, 0.8, and 0.4 filters degraded distance optotype acuity to 2 similar degree (mean 0.22, 0.23, and 0.28 logMAR). Subsequent filters progressively degraded acuity: 0.44, 0.57, 0.91, and 1.69 logMAR. Near optotype acuity was reduced in a similar pattern. Vernier acuity was minimally degraded by 1.0, 0.8, and 0.4 filters (18, 19, and 20 arcsec), followed by progressive degradation with subsequent filters (31, 35, 113, and 387 arcsec). Contrast sensitivity was minimally reduced with filters 1.0 through 0.2 and then precipitously degraded with 0.1 and <0.1 filters. CONCLUSIONS The 1.0, 0.8, and 0.4 filters cause similar, minimal degradation of distance and near optotype and vernier acuity, whereas Subsequent filters cause progressive degradation.,p Contrast sensitivity is not markedly reduced until the 0.1 filter. These results have important implications for the use of Bangerter filters therapeutically. (J AAPOS 2008; 12:555-559)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available