4.3 Article

Multiple sclerosis lesion formation and early evolution revisited: A weekly high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study

Journal

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 761-769

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458515600247

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging; multiple sclerosis; relapsing-remitting; T2 lesions

Funding

  1. French Agency for Research (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) within the context of 'Investments for the Future' program [ANR-10-COHO-002]
  2. Bayer Schering Pharma

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies investigated the evolution of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms leading to blood-brain barrier breakdown and lesion formation. Only a few assessed the early natural history of MS lesions using short-interval longitudinal MRI. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize MS lesion occurrence and early evolution on high-resolution MRI acquired at weekly intervals. Methods: Active lesions were characterized on 3D fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) and gadolinium-enhanced 3D T1-weighted MRI performed weekly (seven weeks) on five untreated patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). Results: Active lesions (n=212) were detected in all patients. All showed contrast-enhancement on at least one time-point. Most new lesions (83.5%) were visible on FLAIR and post-contrast T1-weighted images at first detection; 11.2% showed activity on FLAIR images, one or more weeks before the appearance of contrast-enhancement; 12.5% enhanced before being apparent on FLAIR. Conclusion: Blood brain barrier disruption is a constant step in the natural history of active MS lesions, but does not always constitute the initial event. These findings are consistent with the existence of a subpopulation of lesions with an inside-out' genesis, where neurodegenerative processes might precede microglial activation, and a subsequent adaptive immune response.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available