4.6 Review Book Chapter

Materials Informatics: The Materials Gene and Big Data

Journal

ANNUAL REVIEW OF MATERIALS RESEARCH, VOL 45
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 153-169

Publisher

ANNUAL REVIEWS
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070214-021132

Keywords

uncertainty; statistical inference; information theory; fuzzy logic; rough sets

Funding

  1. NSF [DMR-13-07811, DMS-11-25909]
  2. NSF/DHS [CMMI-09-389018]
  3. AFOSR [FA9550-11-1-0158, FA9550-12-1-0456]
  4. ARO [W911NF-10-1-0397]
  5. Iowa State University
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [1307811] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Mathematical Sciences [1125909] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Materials informatics provides the foundations for a new paradigm of materials discovery. It shifts our emphasis from one of solely searching among large volumes of data that may be generated by experiment or computation to one of targetedmaterials discovery via high-throughput identification of the key factors (i.e., genes) and via showing how these factors can be quantitatively integrated by statistical learning methods into design rules (i.e., gene sequencing) governing targeted materials functionality. However, a critical challenge in discovering these materials genes is the difficulty in unraveling the complexity of the data associated with numerous factors including noise, uncertainty, and the complex diversity of data that one needs to consider (i.e., Big Data). In this article, we explore one aspect of materials informatics, namely how one can efficiently explore for new knowledge in regimes of structure-property space, especially when no reasonable selection pathways based on theory or clear trends in observations exist among an almost infinite set of possibilities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available