4.4 Article

Evaluation of Submonthly Precipitation Forecast Skill from Global Ensemble Prediction Systems

Journal

MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW
Volume 143, Issue 7, Pages 2871-2889

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/MWR-D-14-00277.1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Agency for International Development [AID-OAA-A-11-00011]
  2. U.S. Office of Naval Research (MURI) [N00014-12-1-0911]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The prediction skill of precipitation at submonthly time scales during the boreal summer season is investigated based on hindcasts from three global ensemble prediction systems (EPSs). The results, analyzed for lead times up to 4 weeks, indicate encouraging correlation skill over some regions, particularly over the Maritime Continent and the equatorial Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. The hindcasts from all three models correspond to high prediction skill over the first week compared to the following three weeks. The ECMWF forecast system tends to yield higher prediction skill than the other two systems, in terms of both correlation and mean squared skill score. However, all three systems are found to exhibit large conditional biases in the tropics, highlighted using the mean squared skill score. The sources of submonthly predictability are examined in the ECMWF hindcasts over the Maritime Continent in three typical years of contrasting ENSO phase, with a focus on the combined impact of the intraseasonal MJO and interannual ENSO. Rainfall variations over Borneo in the ENSO-neutral year are found to correspond well with the dominant MJO phase. The contribution of ENSO becomes substantial in the two ENSO years, but the MJO impact can become dominant when the MJO occurs in phases 2-3 during El Nino or in phases 5-6 during the La Nina year. These results support the concept that windows of opportunity of high forecast skill exist as a function of ENSO and the MJO in certain locations and seasons, which may lead to subseasonal-to-seasonal forecasts of substantial societal value in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available