4.1 Article

The Psychometric Properties of the Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12505

Keywords

postpartum functioning; maternal functioning; postpartum health; motherhood

Funding

  1. internal development fund at the University of Pittsburgh
  2. Identification and Therapy of Postpartum Depression Study [R01 MH071825]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo evaluate the psychometric properties of the Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning (BIMF). DesignPrincipal component factor rotation was used to conduct an exploratory factor analysis of the BIMF to determine if more concise versions exist. SettingPatients were recruited from a large, urban medical center in the Northeast. ParticipantsThe BIMF was administered at an initial home visit along with several other self-report and clinical assessments to women who scored10 on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale during the 4- to 6-week postpartum period. MethodsThe BIMF was administered between October 2008 and September 2010. The distribution of BIMF item responses was examined along with interitem correlations. To establish construct validity, correlation coefficients were produced for the BIMF in relation to several other variables or assessments. A factor analysis was performed using principal component factor rotation. ResultsThe factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution. The items that loaded on factor 1 gauged the mother's perception of her own competency in the maternal role and the items that made up factor 2 focused on the mother's needs. Items related to judgment from others and anxiety did not load on either factor. ConclusionsThe BIMF may be administered in its 18-item version, as two separate subscales, or in its original 20-item format. A clinical threshold should be developed to facilitate accurate identification of mothers who are struggling with functioning during the postpartum period.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available