4.1 Article

Randomized, Controlled Trial Evaluating a Baby Wash Product on Skin Barrier Function in Healthy, Term Neonates

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1111/1552-6909.12015

Keywords

randomized; term neonates; wash product; neonatal skin care; transepidermal water loss; noninferiority trial

Funding

  1. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
  2. National Institute for Health Research [MET-08-41-101] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To examine the hypothesis that the use of a wash product formulated for newborn (<1 month of age) bathing is not inferior (no worse) to bathing with water only. Design Assessor-blinded, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. Setting A teaching hospital in the Northwest of England and in participants' homes. Participants Three-hundred-and-seven healthy, term infants recruited within 48hours of birth. Method We compared bathing with a wash product (n=159) to bathing with water alone (n=148). The primary outcome was transepidermal water loss (TEWL) at 14days postbirth; the predefined difference deemed to be unimportant was 1.2. Secondary outcomes comprised changes in stratum corneum hydration, skin surface pH, clinical observations of the skin, and maternal views. Results Complete TEWL data were obtained for 242 (78.8%) infants. Wash was noninferior to water alone in terms of TEWL (intention-to-treat analysis: 95% confidence interval [CI] for difference [washwater, adjusted for family history of eczema, neonate state, and baseline] 1.24, 1.07; per protocol analysis: 95% CI 1.42, 1.09). No significant differences were found in secondary outcomes. Conclusion We were unable to detect any differences between the newborn wash product and water. These findings provide reassurance to parents who choose to use the test newborn wash product or other technically equivalent cleansers and provide the evidence for health care professionals to support parental choice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available