4.7 Article

Thermonuclear detonations ensuing white dwarf mergers

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 454, Issue 4, Pages 4411-4428

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv2289

Keywords

accretion, accretion discs; hydrodynamics; nuclear reactions, nucleosynthesis, abundances; supernovae: general; white dwarfs

Funding

  1. Einstein grant [PF3-140108]
  2. Packard grant
  3. NASA ATP [NNX14AH37G]
  4. Swedish Research Council (VR) [621-2012-4870]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The merger of two white dwarfs (WDs) has for many years not been considered as the favoured model for the progenitor system of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). But recent years have seen a change of opinion as a number of studies, both observational and theoretical, have concluded that they should contribute significantly to the observed SN Ia rate. In this paper, we study the ignition and propagation of detonation through post-merger remnants and we follow the resulting nucleosynthesis up to the point where a homologous expansion is reached. In our study we cover the entire range of WD masses and compositions. For the emergence of a detonation we study three different setups. The first two are guided by the merger remnants from our earlier simulations, while for the third one the ignitions were set by placing hotspots with properties determined by spatially resolved calculations taken from the literature. There are some caveats to our approach which we investigate. We carefully compare the nucleosynthetic yields of successful explosions with SN Ia observations. Only three of our models are consistent with all the imposed constraints and potentially lead to a standard Type Ia event. The first one, a 0.45 M-circle dot helium (He) + 0.9 M-circle dot carbon-oxygen (CO) WD system produces a sub-luminous, SN 1991bg-like event while the other two, a 0.45M(circle dot) He+1.1 M-circle dot oxygen-neon WD system and a 1.05 + 1.05 M-circle dot system with two CO WDs, are good candidates for common SNe Ia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available