4.7 Article

Effect of asphericity in caustic mass estimates of galaxy clusters

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 448, Issue 2, Pages 1644-1659

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu2686

Keywords

galaxies: clusters: general; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; large-scale structure of Universe

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation
  2. Porat Postdoctoral Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The caustic technique for measuring mass profiles of galaxy clusters relies on the assumption of spherical symmetry. When applied to aspherical galaxy clusters, the method yields mass estimates affected by the cluster orientation. Here, we employ mock redshift catalogues generated from cosmological simulations to study the effect of clusters intrinsic shape and surrounding filamentary structures on the caustic mass estimates. To this end, we develop a new method for removing perturbations from large-scale structures, modelled as the two-halo term, in a caustic analysis of stacked cluster data. We find that the cluster masses inferred from kinematical data of 10(14) M-circle dot clusters observed along the major axis are larger than masses from those observed along the minor axis by a factor of 1.7 within the virial radius, increasing to 1.8 within three virial radii. This discrepancy increases by 20 per cent for the most massive clusters. In addition, a smaller but still significant mass discrepancy arises when filamentary structures are present near a galaxy cluster. We find that the mean cluster mass from random sight lines is unbiased at all radii and their scatter ranges from 0.14 to 0.17 within one and three virial radii, with a 40 per cent increase for the most massive clusters. We provide tables which estimate the caustic mass bias given observational constraints on the cluster orientation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available