4.7 Article

Pulsation frequency distribution in δ Scuti stars

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 452, Issue 3, Pages 3073-3084

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1513

Keywords

stars: oscillations; stars: variables: delta Scuti

Funding

  1. NASA's Science Mission Directorate
  2. National Research Foundation of South Africa
  3. Polish NCN [2011/01/B/ST9/05448, 2011/01/M/ST9/05914]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the frequency distributions of Delta Scuti (delta Scuti) stars observed by the Kepler satellite in short-cadence mode. To minimize errors in the estimated stellar parameters, we divided the instability strip into 10 regions and determined the mean frequency distribution in each region. We confirm that the presence of low frequencies is a property of all d Sct stars, rendering meaningless the concept of delta Sct/gamma Dor hybrids. We obtained the true distribution of equatorial rotational velocities in each region and calculated the frequency distributions predicted by pulsation models, taking into account rotational splitting of the frequencies. We confirm that rotation cannot account for the presence of low frequencies. We calculated a large variety of standard pulsation models with different metal and helium abundances, but were unable to obtain unstable low-frequency modes driven by the. mechanism in any model. We also constructed models with modified opacities in the envelope. Increasing the opacity at a temperature log T = 5.06 by a factor of 2 does lead to instability of low-degree modes at low frequencies, but also decreases the frequency range of delta Sct-type pulsations to some extent. We also re-affirm the fact that less than half of the stars in the delta Sct instability strip have pulsations detectable by Kepler. We also point out the huge variety of frequency patterns in stars with roughly similar parameters, suggesting that non-linearity is an important factor in delta Sct pulsations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available