4.7 Article

The chemical signature of surviving Population III stars in the Milky Way

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 453, Issue 3, Pages 2771-2778

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1815

Keywords

radiation: dynamics; stars: low-mass; stars: Population III; Galaxy: stellar content; cosmology: theory; early Universe

Funding

  1. National Nuclear Security Administration of the US Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory [DE-AC52-06NA25396]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cosmological simulations of Population (Pop) III star formation suggest that the primordial initial mass function may have extended to subsolar masses. If Pop III stars with masses <= 0.8 M-circle dot did form, then they should still be present in the Galaxy today as either mainsequence or red giant stars. Despite broad searches, however, no primordial stars have yet been identified. It has long been recognized that the initialmetal-free nature of primordial stars could be masked due to accretion of metal-enriched material from the interstellar medium (ISM). Here, we point out that while gas accretion from the ISM may readily occur, the accretion of dust from the ISM can be prevented due to the pressure of the radiation emitted from low-mass stars. This implies a possible unique chemical signature for stars polluted only via accretion, namely an enhancement in gas phase elements relative to those in the dust phase. Using Pop III stellar models, we outline the conditions in which this signature could be exhibited, and we derive the expected signature for the case of accretion from the local ISM. Intriguingly, due to the large fraction of iron depleted into dust relative to that of carbon and other elements, this signature is similar to that observed in many of the so-called carbon-enhanced metal-poor (CEMP) stars. We therefore suggest that some fraction of the observed CEMP stars may, in fact, be accretion-polluted Pop III stars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available