4.7 Article

The galaxy-halo connection from a joint lensing, clustering and abundance analysis in the CFHTLenS/VIPERS field

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 449, Issue 2, Pages 1352-1379

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv276

Keywords

gravitational lensing: weak; galaxies: clusters: general; cosmology: observations; dark matter

Funding

  1. Canadian Space Agency
  2. European Commission [MRTN-CT-2006-036133]
  3. European Research Council under EC [240672, 240185, 279396]
  4. DFG Emmy Noether grant [Hi 1495/2-1]
  5. INAF through VIPERS
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/K000977/1, ST/H002456/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. STFC [ST/J001422/1, ST/H002456/1, ST/K000977/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present new constraints on the relationship between galaxies and their host dark matter haloes, measured from the location of the peak of the stellar-to-halo mass ratio (SHMR), up to the most massive galaxy clusters at redshift z similar to 0.8 and over a volume of nearly 0.1 Gpc(3). We use a unique combination of deep observations in the CFHTLenS/VIPERS field from the near-UV to the near-IR, supplemented by similar to 60 000 secure spectroscopic redshifts, analysing galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy lensing and the stellar mass function. We interpret our measurements within the halo occupation distribution (HOD) framework, separating the contributions from central and satellite galaxies. We find that the SHMRfor the central galaxies peaks at M-h,M- peak = 1.9(-0.1)(+0.2) x 10(12) M-circle dot with an amplitude of 0.025, which decreases to similar to 0.001 for massive haloes (M-h > 10(14) M-circle dot). Compared to central galaxies only, the total SHMR (including satellites) is boosted by a factor of 10 in the high-mass regime (cluster-size haloes), a result consistent with cluster analyses from the literature based on fully independent methods. After properly accounting for differences in modelling, we have compared our results with a large number of results from the literature up to z = 1: we find good general agreement, independently of the method used, within the typical stellar-mass systematic errors at low to intermediate mass (M-star < 10(11) M-circle dot) and the statistical errors above. We have also compared our SHMR results to semi-analytic simulations and found that the SHMR is tilted compared to our measurements in such a way that they over- (under-) predict star formation efficiency in central (satellite) galaxies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available