4.7 Article

Machine-learning-based photometric redshifts for galaxies of the ESO Kilo-Degree Survey data release 2

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 452, Issue 3, Pages 3100-3105

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv1496

Keywords

techniques: photometric; galaxies: distances and redshifts; galaxies: photometry

Funding

  1. ESO telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory [177.A-3016, 177.A-3017, 177.A-3018]
  2. NOVA
  3. NWO-M grants
  4. Department of Physics and Astronomy of the University of Padova
  5. Department of Physics of Univ. Federico II (Naples)
  6. European Union [267251]
  7. MIUR PRIN
  8. PRIN-INAF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We have estimated photometric redshifts (z(phot)) for more than 1.1 million galaxies of the public European Southern Observatory (ESO) Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) data release 2. KiDS is an optical wide-field imaging survey carried out with the Very Large Telescope (VLT) Survey Telescope (VST) and the OmegaCAM camera, which aims to tackle open questions in cosmology and galaxy evolution, such as the origin of dark energy and the channel of galaxy mass growth. We present a catalogue of photometric redshifts obtained using the Multi-Layer Perceptron with Quasi-Newton Algorithm (MLPQNA) model, provided within the framework of the DAta Mining and Exploration Web Application REsource (DAMEWARE). These photometric redshifts are based on a spectroscopic knowledge base that was obtained by merging spectroscopic data sets from the Galaxy and Mass Assembly (GAMA) data release 2 and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey III (SDSS-III) data release 9. The overall 1 sigma uncertainty on Delta z = (z(spec) - z(phot))/(1 + z(spec)) is similar to 0.03, with a very small average bias of similar to 0.001, a normalized median absolute deviation of similar to 0.02 and a fraction of catastrophic outliers (vertical bar Delta z vertical bar > 0.15) of similar to 0.4 per cent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available