4.7 Article

Linking the fate of massive black hole binaries to the active galactic nuclei luminosity function

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 448, Issue 4, Pages 3603-3607

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv291

Keywords

black hole physics; gravitational waves; galaxies: active; galaxies: interactions; galaxies: nuclei

Funding

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26220703] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Massive black hole binaries are naturally predicted in the context of the hierarchical model of structure formation. The binaries that manage to lose most of their angular momentum can coalesce to form a single remnant. In the last stages of this process, the holes undergo an extremely loud phase of gravitational wave emission, possibly detectable by current and future probes. The theoretical effort towards obtaining a coherent physical picture of the binary path down to coalescence is still underway. In this paper, for the first time, we take advantage of observational studies of active galactic nuclei evolution to constrain the efficiency of gas-driven binary decay. Under conservative assumptions we find that gas accretion towards the nuclear black holes can efficiently lead binaries of any mass forming at high redshift (greater than or similar to 2) to coalescence within the current time. The observed 'downsizing' trend of the accreting black hole luminosity function further implies that the gas inflow is sufficient to drive light black holes down to coalescence, even if they bind in binaries at lower redshifts, down to z approximate to 0.5 for binaries of similar to 107M(circle dot), and z approximate to 0.2 for binaries of similar to 10(6)M(circle dot). This has strong implications for the detection rates of coalescing black hole binaries of future space-based gravitational wave experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available